Wikia

Moon Guard Wiki

Berenal Grayblade

Admin
3,179 Edits since joining this wiki
March 11, 2013
(Redirected from Message Wall:Whitedragon254)
54.81.49.101
  Loading editor
  • Hey Berenal,

    On behalf of someone I saw on the Moon Guard Forums, I'd kindly ask you (or another admin) to take a look at this post: us.battle.net/forums/en/wow/topic/20747667200. It seems he's been banned by a wikia administrator - who isn't an actual admin on the MG wiki - for removing his own content.

    Regards,

    Varadu

      Loading editor
  • Hi Berenal,

    My name is Raedolf, an officer of The Päck on the Emerald Dream. While we aren't on Moonguard, we are a Worgen only RP-PvP guild and my ever growing interest in the Old Ways and my research in Harvest Witches, Celtic lore, and real-world druidism has lead me to the pages on the Aderician Calendar project and the Old ways. There are a great many Harvest Witches on ED, and I have been working on forming and creating a "sect"-like multi-guild RP-group that will include members of the Pack and others for gatherings and other RP events.

    I am greatly interested in your recent work with the pantheon, and - as this is something my friends and I are interested in - I would enjoy helping with expanding the page further to include rituals, spells, grimoires, sacred/secret grounds, rites, festivals, commonly used herbs/reagents, a Gilnean animal/tree symbolism birth calendar, runic "alphabet", etc etc, either through suggestions and discussion with you or direct editing, if allowed (I am still relitively new to the MG wiki and how editing, authority, etc work around here, and I am hesitant to blatently edit a page). Either way, I am interested in helping out and contributing in any way possible.

    -Raedolf A Yaeger

      Loading editor
    • 54.81.49.101
        Loading editor
  • Hey, I think you missed Ranets when you were reverting everything. Just thought I should let you know.

    Regards, Vann

      Loading editor
  • Hey Berenal,

    I was wondering if I could contribute to the Aderician Calendar? I'd like to add some fanon. And by the way, great work on what you've done so far on it, very nice.

    Thanks, Varadu.

      Loading editor
    • Yeah I'm always willing to take suggested content from people. Just pass me your additions through comments and I'll look over it to see if it'd work well with the narrative.

        Loading editor
    • Alright, I was looking to add some of my fanon with the 3 Armed Bandits, and according to the Fanon I wrote, they are notable enough to be put into the calendar. I will comment what I had in mind on the page.

        Loading editor
    • 54.81.49.101
        Loading editor
  • My apologies, I was under the impression Crestfall's page was made by another player whom I have been working with. Please forgive my ignorance.

      Loading editor
  • Hey, I was wondering if I could join the Aderician Calendar project. It looks cool!

      Loading editor
    • 54.81.49.101
        Loading editor
  • Hey,

    I don't know if you had seen my comments on Arthur Proudmoore I 's page, but Zooper and I have been wanting to know whether you wanted Arthur and Thomas to be in the L.A.C.

    If so, we'd also need to discuss how you'd rather we go about this as Thomas and Arthur conflict with our Deaglan and Finbar Proudmoore pages (As all four share the same periods of rulership).

    Thanks.

      Loading editor
    • Well, I don't have a problem linking them together but I've also written a fair amount of KT fanon as seen on most of the Kingdom of Kul Tiras page (most of it is fanon, such as the bone necklaces or the founding of the kingdom/island duchies etc) and it's something I've used in my own RP as well as in my writing before. From what I've seen of yours you're going from a different angle, which is fine, but it also causes conflict with what I've got written out and have been using. If we were going to use the same admirals someone would have to make a change.

        Loading editor
    • Everything Zooper and I have made is always subject to change, which makes linking much more flexible. However, you may have noticed that we have not yet filled out anything from before 0 L.A.C. And if I am correct, you have a decent amount of fanon in that region, yes? We'd be more than happy to keep that area and work on the rest. It could very easily work with what we have so far (Making Deaglan Proudmoore the Lord who rallied the Dukes).

      As for the different Admirals, that would need more work. What would be okay with you in terms of facilitating each other's Admirals?

        Loading editor
    • 54.81.49.101
        Loading editor
  • Hello.

    While I don't mind the edit itself, I would ask the same as you would ask me for your own ship pages and please consult me before editing the page like you did. :)

    I'm perfectly fine in the way of my of edits like spelling, grammar, categories etc. That's all fine. Just larger edits I'd like to be made aware of before it happens.

    Thanks, have a good day.

      Loading editor
    • View all 12 replies
    • Alright well, I didn't see all of this until just now and my point still stands. I don't need to approach you for permission to edit these articles. Once more, you don't own the navy. And based on prior conversations you've approached me on in game? You were intending to give yourself Grand Admiral until I'd told you Jes Tereth held it. While I don't mind what you RP, I do mind if you're going to lie about your intentions.

      As for the pages at large, they're not yours. I don't know what's not getting through to you but let me repeat this.

      Lore pages, even if they're boats/have to do with the navy, are not yours and no one needs to address you personally when editing them. You are not an administrative consultant on the topic and cannot give yourself that sort of authority over anything.

      Skate around it as much as you want, it's very blatantly obvious you have an image for the navy in your mind that not everyone may conform to. Like it or not you do not have the authority nor permission to prevent or request for people to consult you before they make an edit to an article that was not expressly made within your own fanon. The Grand Alliance Navy is a lore organization. The carrier-class is a lore ship. These are not your express creations or your exclusive pages. If you go ahead and make your own classes of ships or fanon that isn't literally just Blizzard's stuff, then you can request people not edit as you wish (aside from categorical/grammatical).

      I'm stating this now for everyone who may have read this/Ranets may have approached in the past, you do not need to go to Ranets for personal approval on naval articles relating to the Grand Alliance Navy, the Navy of any kingdom, ship classes or anything having to do with the sphere of nautical fanon if it is not Ranets' own unique creations. That means edits to pages such as Carrier-class and Grand Alliance Navy are fine. It does not matter if you created the page before someone else, if it relates to a lore ship/organization, you don't suddenly gain control over it because you just happened to make the page first. If the article was not in lore and was actually created by your own imagination and creativity, you have express control over it. Lore organizations/creations you do not. This is coming from someone who is a senior member of the administrative body of the wiki.

        Loading editor
    • Alright, alright. I was attempting to maintain that the reason I was asking for permission was so that I could -Manage- the pages. I never explicitly said I would deny people the right to edit the page. I only asked that I was made aware of what was going on. That was what I was intending. If I worded that otherwise or made it out to look like something else, then sorry. My goal was simply to allow people to be aware that I would like to know what goes on for my pages.

      As for the Grand Alliance Navy, there is actually ALOT in there that is fanon. Besides the history, I'd say a good 60% (Perhaps more.) is fanon that I've weaved to try to meld it with what we know as lore. The divisions, Admiralty, Fleet Air Arm, parts of the navies, etc. etc. That is fanon I've created. There is no direct mention of the term "Fleet Air Arm". There is no direct term to "Air Force', so I created a Fleet Air Arm with attachments to the Navy so that we had -something-.

      You go onto the GAN  page and see what is fanon and what is lore, Berenal, I assure you will see what I mean.

      As I said before, I'm simply just going to leave this argument. my point was out of hand, and I should have contacted you about this personnally. Whatever you, Everen's or anyone else's opnions of my leaving is, I don't care. 

      Thanks, and have a good day because I know mine's a bit tarnished now.

      -Rane.

        Loading editor
    • 54.81.49.101
        Loading editor
  • Hey! I would just like to inquire about that. I have no issue with someone else being a FC as well, so long as the Fleet or Navy they hold the post in is independant from the GAN (As Ranets is the FC of the GAN, and you can't have two of the same Navy, if you follow).

    So I'm basically just wanting to know wether or not the Headlands Armada is independant from the Grand Alliance Navy. If it is indepenant, all good, mate! i won't be an issue. If not, I'd like to discuss about how we can balance things out?

      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
    • This reply has been removed
    • Issue resolved. Thanks for your time. :)

        Loading editor
    • 54.81.49.101
        Loading editor
  • Hey! So you might have seen I've been fixing up some of the medal pages I've made and I was just curious, reading the Liam's Cross page. If the Liam's Cross was added following the SoO, does that make it apart of the Grand Alliance Military Order of Wear, or is it still purely the Gilnean Military, however crumbeled it is?

    If it is in the Alliance, where does it fit in the OoW?

      Loading editor
    • It's a purely Gilnean Military medal. I'm of the mind that Gilneas still keeps a significant level of separation from the GA in terms of things like this; given they were never ultra Alliance in any iteration of it. While they're def more into the GA than the AoL, I still think they'd keep that whole Gilnean pride centralism when it comes to their military.

        Loading editor
    • Fair enough! Thanks, buddy. ^^

        Loading editor
    • 54.81.49.101
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki